HOW THE PIRATES TOP 100 CAME ABOUT.
BY DAVE FINOLI
When putting together our thoughts for the book my colleague Bill Ranier and I wrote called "The Pittsburgh Pirates Encyclopedia", we both agreed probably the highlight of the project was going to be the creation of a list, the top 100 Pirates of all time.
A list such as that is never going to be one that is agreed on by any two people who look at it, but Bill and I wanted to use not only our opinions, but we wanted to create a statistical formula, that would not only reward a player for leading the league in various categories, but compare his statistics with that of the league average that particular year. A 2.50 ERA is much more impressive in today's game than it would be in the early 1900's and conversely a .280 batting average was a big number in 1968 as compared to 1930 for example.
We both created our top 100 list and awarded points in inverse order of the selection( the number 1 guy got 100 pts while the number 100 bucco received only 1). Bill and I both put are lists together and added up the points, creating our combined top 100 Pirate list. We then did the same with this list as the other, giving points in inverse order of their finish, and then doubled the total so it would have the proper weight with the points derived from the formula we were about to put together. We added to two numbers (our list and the formula points) and wa-la, the top 100 Pirates of all-time came together.
The following will not only give the formula, but will show the top 20 Pirates from our list, the formula list and the top 20 point getters:
TOP 20 PIRATES
OUR LIST PTS LIST
|
# |
PLAYER |
PTS |
# |
PLAYER |
PTS |
|
1 |
WAGNER |
200 |
1 |
WAGNER |
674 |
|
2 |
CLEMENTE |
198 |
2 |
CLEMENTE |
368 |
|
3 |
P WANER |
196 |
3 |
P WANER |
363 |
|
4 |
STARGELL |
194 |
4 |
STARGELL |
272 |
|
5 |
KINER |
192 |
5 |
ADAMS |
227 |
|
6 |
BONDS |
190 |
6 |
KINER |
225 |
|
7 |
TRAYNOR |
188 |
7 |
BONDS |
172.5 |
|
8 |
VAUGHAN |
186 |
8 |
PARKER |
166 |
|
9 |
COOPER |
184 |
9 |
VAUGHAN |
160 |
|
10 |
PARKER |
182 |
10 |
CAREY |
154 |
|
11 |
MAZEROSKI |
180 |
11 |
L WANER |
150 |
|
12 |
L WANER |
178 |
12 |
KREMER |
147.5 |
|
13 |
ADAMS |
176 |
13 |
FACE |
147 |
|
14 |
CUYLER |
174 |
14 |
TRAYNOR |
143.5 |
|
15 |
CLARKE |
172 |
15 |
COOPER |
136 |
|
16 |
CAREY |
170 |
16 |
CLARKE |
133 |
|
17 |
PHILLIPPE |
168 |
17 |
MAZEROSKI |
132 |
|
18 |
LEEVER |
166 |
18 |
LEEVER |
117.5 |
|
19 |
GILES |
164 |
19 |
PHILLIPPE |
108 |
|
20 |
OLIVER |
162 |
20 |
FRIEND |
104.5 |
FINAL TOP 20 LIST
|
# |
PLAYER |
PTS |
|
1 |
WAGNER |
874 |
|
2 |
CLEMENTE |
566 |
|
3 |
P WANER |
559 |
|
4 |
STARGELL |
466 |
|
5 |
KINER |
417 |
|
6 |
ADAMS |
403 |
|
7 |
BONDS |
362.5 |
|
8 |
PARKER |
348 |
|
9 |
VAUGHAN |
346 |
|
10 |
TRAYNOR |
331.5 |
|
11 |
L WANER |
328 |
|
12 |
CAREY |
324 |
|
13 |
COOPER |
320 |
|
14 |
MAZEROSKI |
312 |
|
15 |
KREEMER |
305.5 |
|
16 |
CLARKE |
305 |
|
17 |
FACE |
293 |
|
18 |
LEEVER |
283.5 |
|
19 |
PHILLIPPE |
276 |
|
20 |
CUYLER |
267.5 |
THE FORMULA
Offense
League leaders: Homers, runs, average, on base percentage and slugging
7,4,3,2,1
doubles, triples
3,2,1
stolen bases
2
RBIs
9,5,3,2,1
mvp
15,10,7,5,3,
wins
9,5,4,3,2,1
era, saves, win% opob%
7,4,3,2,1
k, relief ranking, ratio
3,2,1
cy young
15,10,7,5,3
BONUS POINTS
Hall of fame as a pirate, 25
Hall of fame 3 significant years 12.5
For every 20 pts over the league average in slugging and batting average 1 pt
For every 20 pts over the team win % in pitchers win % 1 pt(use for reliever when more than 10 wins)
Leading the league in fielding 3 pts
Gold glove, 5 pts
ERA 1 pt for every .1 below the league average (starter 154 ip reliever 1950-1979 70 ip)
Saves 1950-1960 15 or more 1pt, 1pt for every 3 above
1960-1982 20 saves 1pt, 1pt per every 3 above
1982 and above- 30 saves 1pt, 1 pt for every three above
all-time records 20 pts
1 pt for every year of service as a starter, for pitchers 1965-2001 top 5 starter, before top 4, relief every season of 20 games or more
hits- 180 in a year 3 pts, 200, 5 pts 1 pt for every 20 more hits, 1 pt for leading the league
Wins-after deadball- 18 wins 3-pts, 20- 5pts, 1 pt for every 3 wins more.
Deadball, 20 wins 3 pts, 25- 5pts, 1 for every 3 more wins
Pre 1900, 27 wins 3 pts, 30 wins 5 pts, 1 pt for every 4 wins.
Here is an example of how the Formula works, using Babe Adams, who was the most surprising player to us, scoring the 5th highest total in the list.
BABE ADAMS-227 PTS
SCORING IN THE TOP 100 PIRATE SYSTEM
ERA VS LEAGUE ERA-65 PTS ERA-17 PTS
|
YEARS |
ERA |
LEAGUE ERA |
POINTS |
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
|
1910 |
2.24 |
3.0 |
7 |
1910 |
5-1 |
|
1911 |
2.33 |
3.4 |
11 |
1911 |
3-3 |
|
1912 |
2.91 |
3.2 |
3 |
1913 |
2-4 |
|
1913 |
2.15 |
3.0 |
8 |
1919 |
5-1 |
|
1914 |
2.51 |
2.6 |
1 |
1920 |
2-4 |
|
1919 |
1.98 |
3.0 |
10 |
1921 |
2-4 |
|
1920 |
2.16 |
3.2 |
10 |
|
|
|
1921 |
2.64 |
3.8 |
11 |
|
|
|
1922 |
3.57 |
4.0 |
4 |
|
|
WINS-1 PTS SAVES-4 PTS WIN %-12 PTS
|
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
|
1911 |
5-1 |
1925 |
3-3 |
1909 |
3-3 |
|
|
|
1926 |
5-1 |
1910 |
5-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1921 |
1-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1923 |
5-1 |
OP OB %-42 PTS KS-1 PT BB+H/9 INN RATIO-19PTS
|
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
YEAR |
PL-PTS |
|
1910 |
4-2 |
1913 |
5-1 |
1911 |
1-3 |
|
1911 |
1-7 |
|
|
1913 |
2-2 |
|
1912 |
5-1 |
|
|
1914 |
1-3 |
|
1914 |
1-7 |
|
|
1919 |
1-3 |
|
1915 |
5-1 |
|
|
1920 |
1-3 |
|
1919 |
1-7 |
|
|
1921 |
1-3 |
|
1920 |
1-7 |
|
|
1922 |
2-2 |
|
1921 |
1-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1922 |
3-3 |
|
|
|
|
CY YOUNG PTS (WE USED TOTAL BASEBALLS TOTAL PITCHER RANKINGS DUE TO LACK OF CY YOUNG AWARD DURING HIS TIMEPERIOD)-25 PTS
|
YEAR |
FINISH |
PTS |
|
1911 |
3RD |
7 |
|
1913 |
3RD |
7 |
|
1919 |
5TH |
3 |
|
1920 |
5TH |
3 |
|
1921 |
4TH |
5 |
BONUS POINTS- 41 PTS
· 25-WORLD SERIES 1909 MVP
· 10- YEARS AS TOP 4 STARTER
· 6-2 20 WIN SEASONS (1911 & 1913)
While we were both pleased with the final outcome, we are still trying to perfect the formula for a potential second edition. Any suggestions anyone has, please do not hesitate to e mail me at nosecat91874@aol.com. Any comments or suggestions would be most appreciated